Ethical case study( The loss of the Shuttle Columbia) Essay

Ethical case study( The loss of the hoot capital of South Carolina) - Essay ExampleThe recommendations balance deontological and utilitarian ethics thus, NASA would achieve better outcomes in terms of explore and space exploration. The Loss of the travel capital of South Carolina An Ethical Case Study The 28th flight of the Columbia mixed baging the 113th mission of the Space Shuttle Program ended in loss of the mission and a tragic loss of the crew. The mechanical cause of the loss of the Shuttle Columbia and the seven crew members on display panel has been inform to be a breach in the spaceships Thermal Protection scheme on the left hand wing side-wing resulting from a piece of insulating foam (Niewoehner, Steidle, and Johnson 11). However, the loss of the Shuttle Columbia has attracted different perspectives of analysis, anyways the mechanical viewpoint, as to other determinants of the outcomes. Studies into the loss of the Shuttle Columbia are important since a build o f lessons can be discerned from the mechanical, leadership and ethical view points. Besides, it helps to generate recommendations for action that would guide space missions and the wider applied science field to avert similar occurrences. This study provides a back country on the engineering/technical trial that resulted in the loss of the Shuttle Columbia as reported. An in-depth evaluation of the engineering, management, regulatory and socio-technical issues surrounding the unfortunate hazard is undertaken. This is then followed by an analysis of the ethical lapses that contributed to the loss of the Shuttle Columbia, before the generation of recommendations based on an ethical framework. BACKGROUND Engineering Failures As a prelude, the Space Shuttle Program launched the Columbia in January 28, 1986 a launch had never been undertaken at such cold temperatures. The bird exploded after tho 7 seconds of launching (Baura 148). Lessons had not been learned when similar oversights occurred seventeen years later with the loss of the Shuttle Columbia on February 1, 2003. Shuttle Columbia was launched on January 16, 2003 for a 16 day mission to sports stadium the earth and promote science research. The first evidence of engineering failure appeared 81.7 seconds after the launch when Columbia was approximately 65,820 feet above the ground. With the shuttle traveling at about 1650 mph, a large piece of insulating form that was hand-crafted came off the Orbiter-external tank attachment area. The fall-out piece then struck the leading edge of the shuttles left wing at 81.9 seconds after the launch. These incidents were not detected immediately either by the on-board crew or by the ground team rather, they were observed the next day by the ground support team upon detailed analysis of the launchs videos and pictures. The damage on the lead left wing appeared to have not had any effects on the 16 day space operations of the shuttle as the mission met its space objec tives. Reports provide details that the Columbia Shuttle re-entered the earths atmosphere with an existing breach to its leading edge of the left wing. The exact position of the breach is reported as proximal to the panel 8 of the RCC (Reinforced Carbon-Carbon). The breach is deemed sufficiently big enough to allow for the brainwave of super-heated air above 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit into the space behind the RCC panel. The super-heated air was then able to penetrate the left wing and destroy its structural parts such as the insulation and the aluminum wing spur. elaborated analysis o